Home | Forums | What's new | Resources | |
You are trapped in a Zombie infested city |
link343 - Nov 4, 2005 |
1 | 2 | Next> |
tsumake | Nov 4, 2005 | |||
You should include a hunting rifle with scope. In this type of situation, I would think that a hunting rifle would be more available than a rocket launcher. |
link343 | Nov 4, 2005 | |||
thats whats the other is for. |
KuKzz | Nov 5, 2005 | |||
Tank/Big van/truck with enough food & water for 7 days |
it290 | Nov 5, 2005 | |||
Are these the classic 'decapitation or burning are the only ways to kill' zombies? Or can they die from just taking enough bullets, like in RE? |
Cloud121 | Nov 5, 2005 | ||||
Also part of RE (Rebirth on GameCube). |
it290 | Nov 5, 2005 | |||
Not really, you can still kill the tampon heads by shooting them normally after they get up again. So they don't have to be decapitated or burned. |
Cloud121 | Nov 6, 2005 | |||
Bro, have you been drinking again? Even with a spear, I'd still scream "Waaa!" |
crazygoat | Nov 6, 2005 | |||
the car might be a good idea depending on if it gets good gas mileage or not |
MasterAkumaMatata | Nov 7, 2005 | |||
I'd choose a brain. It can serve as a weapon, or it can serve as food for the zombies (only if it fails). |
ExCyber | Nov 7, 2005 | |||
Xbox. |
schi0249 | Nov 7, 2005 | |||
man, with an xbox, you could cave in a few skulls. me, I'd go for a panic room. Someplace where i could live for 7 days and have somewhat of a food and water supply. |
schi0249 | Nov 7, 2005 | |||
I would think the "best" zombie mobile would have the worst gas mileage. A nice military issue hummer could take quite a beating. However, man would it suck up the gas. Since we are dealing with hypotheticals, what about a light saber/laser? |
Mask of Destiny | Nov 7, 2005 | ||||
Well even the most rugged zombie mobile is relatively useless once it runs out of gas. I personally think an older sedan (but not a huge boat of a sedan) is probably the best comprimise, particularly if you can manage to weld a more substantial bumper on the thing. If you can't, you can always drive backwards when you're mowing down zombies so you don't risk damage to the radiator. It's not like you need a huge car to run someone over. |
link343 | Nov 7, 2005 | |||
If I had to chose a place to go in a zombie attack, I would chose the mall. |
it290 | Nov 7, 2005 | |||||||
No, but you might need a huge car to run a horde over.
Welcome to the zombie fold, my friend. |
Mask of Destiny | Nov 7, 2005 | |||
Even a compact car (ones made within the past couple of decades anyway) has a curb weight of at least 2000 pounds. Since the front of the car isn't incredibly wide, it's unlikely you'll be making contact with more than 4 or 5 Zombie's at once. Assuming the average zombie weighs no more than 200 pounds, the car has at least a 2:1 mass advantage before you take into account the occupants of the car. As long as the car isn't underpowered I don't see a real problem plowing down a horde of zombies. My biggest concern is the damage the car will take in the process (thus the non-crumple zone requirement), the most critical type being damage to the radiator (thus the suggestion to do as much zombie bashing in reverse as possible). |
lordofduct | Nov 7, 2005 | ||||
I didn't even put any thought into it... that was my friends answer. And really, a chainsaw uses a LOT of upper and lower body strength. I don't know if you've ever cut down a tree before, but you tire REAL fast. I'd say faster then with a katana. If it were me out there I'd go with the car... a car like in "Quarantine" with the ramming gear on the front and possibly run down all you other fuckers and strap your chainsaws and guns onto my taxi cab of diseased hell and go pickin' off those fuckers. oh God did I love that game... especially it's REALLY cheap CD-Key system of trying to keep you from bootlegging. That was funny. I need to reinstall that on my DOS box just so I can have some carnage and fun. |
1 | 2 | Next> |