| Home | Forums | What's new | Resources | |
| Windows evil |
| Gallstaff - Nov 2, 2003 |
| 1 | 2 | Next |
| Tagrineth | Nov 2, 2003 | ||
| Try limiting your page file to around 448MB (general tip). Also, you probably need to defrag. | |||
| Gallstaff | Nov 2, 2003 | ||
| How do i do the page file fo shizzle? | |||
| racketboy | Nov 2, 2003 | ||
| I had my page file set a 2GB. I just lowered it to 700MB last week. Maybe it's a coincidence, but my system seems slower now | |||
| Resident_Lurker | Nov 2, 2003 | ||
| You're having all kinds of problems aren't you? First Winamp explodes, then Windows is screwed, computer won't even turn on. Good luck with ALL that.... | |||
| Gallstaff | Nov 2, 2003 | ||
| hah and new ones just keep comin. I need third party drivers for my live 5.1, these are shit. anyone know any? | |||
| Gallstaff | Nov 2, 2003 | ||
| Uh I dont have options quite like that, i'm in 2k | |||
| racketboy | Nov 3, 2003 | ||
| yeah I have mine on a separate partition | |||
| dnguyen800 | Nov 3, 2003 | ||
| Hey, can anyone recommend a free defragmenting program? I've used the Microsoft one four times and it still says my partition needs to be defragmented. Now when I click on a file in file explorer, my HD loads like crazy. | |||
| Alexvrb | Nov 3, 2003 | |||
Yes... but it'd involve you breaking the Live 5.1 over your knee and replacing it with a different card. But then you could use non-Creative drivers without a hitch. | ||||
| Taelon | Nov 3, 2003 | ||
| Actually, Microsoft's defrag is a lite version of Diskeeper these days. A good one I use is VoptXP from www.goldenbow.com... . As for why your computer keeps telling you the HD needs to be defragged, could it be that it's nearly full? In that case it's near impossible to really rearrange files, especially large ones like, say, DivX movies. Likely reasons for general slowdowns in XP (as observed by me personally) - cannot speak for 2K here: * not enough RAM. Even 256MB is rather on the low end, so I quickly upped mine to 512MB. * Indexing service is enabled. Stop and disable it through Services Manager. Then rightclick each HD partition in Explorer and uncheck "Allow file indexing", apply to all files and folders when asked. * Service Pack 1 introduces a bug that would slow WinXP down. There is a post-SP1 hotfix for this. * System Restore can cause the HD to fill up rapidly. Delete all but the most recent restore points. Often, restore points will be set automatically by at least Windows Update and by setups using Windows Installer (.msi packages), possibly other apps as well. On a side note, it might be a good idea to turn System Restore OFF on all partitions except the system partition, since there really is no point in maintaining restore points on storage, backup or pagefile partitions. I have an SBLive! 5.1 by the way. Its drivers have never given me any trouble. I avoid downloading them from Creative, though, instead I use the ones provided with Windows. Since I bought my new PC this summer, there's actually been one driver update for SBLive cards on Windows Update which I installed. Not a single problem with sound here. | |||
| dnguyen800 | Nov 3, 2003 | ||
| My HD is pretty full, so I guess thats the reason. | |||
| gameboy900 | Nov 3, 2003 | |||
What's the reasoning behind that? I'm just wondering what makes FAT "faster". [/b][/quote] Basically you're getting rid of the overhead associated with FAT32 and NTFS. FAT is the simplest of the three Windows file system types. FAT32 adds extra things to enable it to deal with more files and NTFS has all that security stuff added to it. Basically things that a partition with a single file doesn't need to have. You're basically removing allot of overhead for a frequently used file. | ||||
| racketboy | Nov 3, 2003 | ||
| so should I bump my page file back up to 2GB for better performance. I have 1GB of RAM. I can switch it over to FAT too. A little OT: what about a Photoshop page file? | |||
| slinga | Nov 3, 2003 | ||
| I guess I'll had to this windows swap file discussion... I always heard you should keep your max and min equal. This way, it will always (?) avoid fragmentation. | |||
| racketboy | Nov 3, 2003 | |||
yeah I do that too | ||||
| Scared0o0Rabbit | Nov 3, 2003 | ||
| so wait, you can't change your pagefile size in 2k? Funny cause I remember doing it back in windows 95 and stuff, and I doubt they'd remove it specifically for 2k.... you might not be looking in the right place. | |||
| 1 | 2 | Next |