Home | Forums | What's new | Resources | |
Upgrading OS vs Clean Install |
mal - Sep 12, 2004 |
mal | Sep 12, 2004 | |||
Are there any significant disadvantages in performing an upgrade install compared to doing a clean istall? |
mal | Sep 12, 2004 | |||
I'm not that keen on installing/configuring apps again. Alexvrb - I'm just wondering if my HD related failures are somehow OS related. *shrug* |
mal | Sep 12, 2004 | |||
AFAICT the HDs themselves are fine - they just like to forget that they've got partitions and data on them. At first I thought it may have been to do with the fact that the drives were too hot, so I spaced them a bit better. I also thought that overclocking may have had something to do with it - until I moved one to another machine that was running at stock speed and it failed. <_< I don't think it's the same drive that's gone more than once so either I've had a bad batch of drives - and I bought them over a period of several months It could always be something completely different. |
lordofduct | Sep 13, 2004 | |||
are they MAXTOR... hehe, i hate maxtor drives |
mal | Sep 13, 2004 | |||
No, they're Seagates. Both drives that I've had issues with have been 200GB 7200.7 parallel ATA drives. If nothing else I'm good at backing up my data these days. |
racketboy | Sep 13, 2004 | |||
do you have fans running over the drives? not required, but it's nice for fast, hot drives |
mal | Sep 13, 2004 | |||
The PC that's running stock speeds has both a 120mm exhast fan at the back of the case and a second (higher speed*) 120mm fan for intake at the front just behind the HDs. There's plenty of air running over them but it hasn't seemed to have helped. :/ * I was planning on slowing it somewhat eventually, but I haven't got around to it yet. |
Alexvrb | Sep 13, 2004 | |||
They don't really benefit after a certain point, Racket. I just wanted to make sure they weren't being packed together and frying. Also, since he's tried them in different (otherwise OK) machines, I'd suspect the drives just have what we call in the computer business "SUCK TEH CACK". It's a technical term, I won't get into it here. Suffice it to say that your best bet is replacing the drives (you could also try and get warranty service, but good luck). I mean HDs aren't *that* much anymore, but it is inconvenient. Although I did see a nice 250GB 7k250 for around $160. Although your prices aren't going to be so good, from what I've seen from stores down under. |
Krelian | Sep 14, 2004 | |||
Have you run DFT on them? http://www.hitachigst.com/hdd/support/download.htm... ~Krelian P.S.: Ooooohh, the new version supports SATAs. P.P.S.: I'd vote clean too, nothing can eliminate the free radicals of an OS upgrade like installing clean. |
Pyrite | Sep 14, 2004 | |||
I also have a Seagate HD (120GB) and it has 4 partitions running on win2k/win98se for more than 7 months with this drive and I´ve yet to run by any problems. The only time I had those kind of problems you described was when I tried a funky HD which had a bunch of bad sectors. Clean install is always better specially if you are having problems. |
Alexvrb | Sep 14, 2004 | |||
Yeah, you should run a drive fitness test on them for sure. But have you already run a surface scan on them? Once you start getting bad sectors, its generally all downhill. |