Home	Forums	What's new	Resources

SGCC JAS macros

mic - Oct 16, 2005

		mic	Oct 16, 2005
		I've got SGCC, and it works fine. But now I'm at the point where I'd like to write to macros to use in my assembly code, but I don't know the syntax (if there even is one). I've already tried macro name, .macro name, name macro and name .macro. None of those worked..

		cgfm2	Oct 16, 2005
		Originally posted by mic@Sun, 2005-10-16 @ 05:56 PM I've got SGCC, and it works fine. But now I'm at the point where I'd like to write to macros to use in my assembly code, but I don't know the syntax (if there even is one). I've already tried macro name, .macro name, name macro and name .macro. None of those worked.. [post=140759]Quoted post[/post] This isn't really helpful, but the syntax used by SNASM68K is much more normal than the GCC assembly syntax. You may want to use that for writing assembly code. However, I have not been able to figure out how to link SNASM68K object files with a C program. They are supposed to be COFF but do not resemble that format. So using it with SGCC (or any other GCC 68K toolchain) may be difficult or impossible.

		mic	Oct 16, 2005
		Well, except for this annoying shortcoming, I really like JAS. Snasm68k does absolutely nothing on my system (yes, I downloaded the XP/2000 version). The gnu 68k assembler has horrible syntax (like prepending registers with %). asm68 and system68 don't appear as good alternatives either.

		Kaneda	Oct 16, 2005
		I suggest you to try my MaccerX version Maccer is a pre processor used for macro and binaries include MaccerX is a mod of it to support JAS and XGCC I would also suggest you to use XGCC since SGCC is VERY bugged and a lot of people stop Genny dev because of that

		mic	Oct 16, 2005
		I found m68k-coff-as with the --register-prefix-optional and --bitwise-or flags to be an acceptable solution.