Home | Forums | What's new | Resources | |
Windows Source Code Leaked! |
IceDigger - Feb 12, 2004 |
1 | 2 | Next> |
IceDigger | Feb 12, 2004 | |||
Story... What do you think the consequences of this are? More lethal viruses? |
Gallstaff | Feb 12, 2004 | |||
I think it means many a windows clone will be sprining up in a few years |
antime | Feb 12, 2004 | |||
If it's true, that code is poisonous. Noone who's ever looked at it can work on an operating system ever without fear of being sued out of existence. |
Dud | Feb 12, 2004 | |||
Can you link to a download page? Just kidding, don't tackle me mal. |
racketboy | Feb 12, 2004 | |||
wow! yeah -- don't think too many people are stupid enough to try doing much with it |
antime | Feb 12, 2004 | |||
That's the rumour. Anyway, a posted file list... of the purported Windows 2000 source archive reveals that it's an old snapshot from 2001. It's also only about 650MB (CD-sized? Coincidence or just one of a set of backup CDs?) and seems to lack a lot of components from the "full" distribution. It's interesting to note that not only does the archive still contain the MIPS, Alpha and PowerPC directories from NT4, but there's already some support for ia64. |
it290 | Feb 12, 2004 | |||
I'm guessing this will probably lead to a lot of security problems and not much else. Although some underground developers will probably take the code and release their own versions of Windows for various purposes (stripped down mini-distros come to mind). I wonder if a lot of NDA code has been leaked-- there's probably some proprietary hardware information buried within the source code for various drivers, if those were leaked. |
Alexvrb | Feb 13, 2004 | |||
Last I heard it was "only" like 13.5 million lines of code leaked out of 30+ million lines. Christ, who would WANT to subject themselves to that kind of torture? |
it290 | Feb 13, 2004 | |||
Heh, yeah, I don't foresee any one person going through ALL the code- nor can I imagine many reasons why you would want to. |
AntiPasta | Feb 13, 2004 | |||
The whole sourcecode is supposed to be 40GB so I've heard |
stack99 | Feb 13, 2004 | |||
:agree :agree I have heard that as well, the other thing you get from ms, is that win 2k was around 200,000,000 lines of code, and xp and 2k3 adds to that... I think 40g, might be if not right, damn near close. :agree |
antime | Feb 13, 2004 | |||
According to a Usenix talk... the total size was 50GB (see the slide titled "Source Code Control System (Windows 2000)") but I'm pretty sure that's the space required to do a full build, ie. object files and temporary files are included. |
it290 | Feb 13, 2004 | |||
I thought one of those slides said the size required for a total build was 80g. Yeah, most likely it isn't the whole thing. But, (as someone pointed out at slashdot), let's not forget that source code compresses extremely well. |
antime | Feb 13, 2004 | |||
The size of the compressed archive is under 250MB, the uncompressed size is 650MB. Anyway, it seems like it's the real deal... (note the "portions of"). |
slinga | Feb 13, 2004 | |||
What's with all the makefiles? These guys don't use visual studio |
ExCyber | Feb 13, 2004 | |||
I'd laugh if they were cross-compiling from Xenix... |
antime | Feb 13, 2004 | |||
Visual Studio's dependency system isn't so great, so several people at my workplace use GNU Make to run their compiles. Also, if you don't want to or can't use Visual Studio it's a good option (Emacs users, automated builds etc.). Microsoft's nmake is so crippled it's not a real option. |
gameboy900 | Feb 13, 2004 | |||
If they find out who actually leaked the code you can be that MS will make sure that the cops are not involved in punishing that person. If you know what I mean. Shit they got enough money to make whoever is responsible for this enjoy pain for many years to come. Let's just hope our firewalls (YOU HAVE ONE RIGHT!?!) are strong enough against the onslaught of viruses. |
1 | 2 | Next> |