Home | Forums | What's new | Resources | |
Winamp3 |
Quadriflax - Aug 14, 2002 |
1 | 2 | Next> |
Gallstaff | Aug 14, 2002 | |||
Well i dunno johnD, i think that winamp 2.x is pretty good. i've used it since 1998/99 then got a new comp that came with music match JB (ew) and then relaized how much better winamp was switched back to 2.80. Although i will say that while clunkly, real player is not horrible, just slightly less than good. |
Ratamahatta | Aug 14, 2002 | |||
I use winamp 2.80 and its pretty good, although the best version of winamp that I used was winamp 1.7 |
Gallstaff | Aug 14, 2002 | |||
when was that popular? |
SkankinMonkey | Aug 14, 2002 | |||
Winamp 3 isn't bad, i like the real support for Ogg out of the box (which is kinda iffy in the 2.x versions which you had to work around with to get to really work). The media player isn't bad, but it's not good either. The official release is much better than the previous beta/alpha releases though, where the program often took 20 seconds to startup, so I hope they're heading in the right direction. |
Trenton net | Aug 14, 2002 | |||
The Original 6.x media players that came packed with 98 was excelent, however the new 7.x media players for windows totaly bites. The interface was made huge and chunky like Real Audio, and it lost everything that made it good. In fact, even the Mpeg 1 codec was messed up, as now images look pixaly and jagged as ever! |
Merc248 | Aug 14, 2002 | |||
i think its real nice when u get a good skin for it... btw, check out winamp.deskmod.com, theres a chock full of winamp 3 skins there |
Raijin Z | Aug 14, 2002 | |||
Windows Media Player screws my system up if I have a CD in either of my drives... >_< Winamp 2 is okay. I use it strictly for playing emulated music (NSF files and the like). I tried 3 a couple years or so ago, it was okay, but there's really no reason why it should be better than 2. |
antime | Aug 14, 2002 | ||||
Start/Run/mplayer2.exe. If you just want the old look, switch to "Compact Mode" from the View menu. Anyhow, there are more mp3 players than there are stars in the sky so everyone should be able to find at least one they like, even if it's mpg123 -s > /dev/audio. |
Trenton net | Aug 14, 2002 | |||
antime --> Going to compact mode is just cosmetic. A lot of things still don't change (Such as the floating tool bar in skin mode), ect and it reverts back to the default skin when you do many things. Plus you can't configure the Classic skin because basicly its just a skin. Not the real thing. On top of that, the render/codec they use for Mpeg has been also degraded. Compare a VCD on ether program and you can tell the diffrence right away when dealing with resizing. Its very pixley. |
klakalou | Aug 14, 2002 | |||
winamp 2 is fine. i got some cool skins. besides, is there a better mp3 player out there u crybabys |
bizarre001 | Aug 14, 2002 | |||
Awful, it is going to be a long while before they either force people to switch over to or then actaully sit knock the bugs out of it and optimize the code. |
gamefoo21 | Aug 14, 2002 | |||
umm what about win media 8(standard with xp) or 9(beta) i use 9 right now yummy beta testing and its really good lots of improvements i can watch full screen dvd quality divx without slowdown where as with the official divx player i can't full screen without it skipping all over the place and the quality is just awesome ties right into all the old codec's and uses em if it din't install newer ones. |
racketboy | Aug 14, 2002 | |||
I don't even want to try it. After I saw the recommended specs I knew it was bloatware. If love Winamp 2.X -- if it aint broke, don't fix it!!! |
wonder_k | Aug 17, 2002 | |||
WA3 suxx! i can't even configure the mp3-plugin the way it was back in 2.x never seen a final worse than the prior versions... |
XAKEP | Aug 18, 2002 | |||
Yeah I don't like 3 ... I use 2.8 ... |
Curtis | Aug 19, 2002 | |||
Yeah same here. Been playin' around with it a bit and I can't see any improvements. I want my playlist to show total track times (not "Playlist 012 *modified*...), I don't need another video player, I want to configure my plug-ins, etc, etc... Guess it's 2.8 for me - if it ain't broke, don't fix it |
DBOY | Aug 21, 2002 | |||
My only problem with Winamp 3 is that it's incompatable with Winamp 2 plugins. The audio plugins are the only reason I even use winamp. I'ma big fan of chip tunes so I like having one program to handle them all. |
1 | 2 | Next> |