Home | Forums | What's new | Resources | |
This is disgusting |
Gallstaff - Apr 24, 2004 |
1 | 2 | Next> |
Gallstaff | Apr 24, 2004 | |||
Just look at the poll... for the love of god |
E Nice | Apr 25, 2004 | |||
Best Game Ever, Goldeneye vs. Panzer Dragoon Saga, I take it. |
Gallstaff | Apr 25, 2004 | |||
It hurts me to look |
antime | Apr 25, 2004 | |||
And then there's the people who have played both and found GoldenEye better than PDS. I know I did, and voted accordingly. |
Gallstaff | Apr 25, 2004 | |||
Goldeneye was fun but not the revolutionary game that people rate it to be |
antime | Apr 25, 2004 | |||
Repeat the above, but replace "Goldeneye" with "Panzer Dragoon Saga". |
it290 | Apr 25, 2004 | ||||
Well, the multiplayer element was pretty novel for console FPS games at the time. Goldeneye was probably a lot of people's first multiplayer FPS, and it was a good one at that.. personally, I grew up on Quakeworld, so I don't rate Goldeneye that highly, but it was a sweet game. |
racketboy | Apr 25, 2004 | |||
Goldeneye was nice and all, but I still don't know what the big deal was. |
Pearl Jammzz | Apr 25, 2004 | |||
Both are excellent games, but I view Mario64 as the superior. I liked/played it TONZ more |
Protosstic | Apr 25, 2004 | |||
Yeah nights isn't as good as Mario, but nights is good |
it290 | Apr 25, 2004 | |||
Hmm... I dunno. Mario 64 has many more stages and things to find, but Nights is one of the ultimate score attack games. |
ExCyber | Apr 25, 2004 | ||||
Goldeneye was arguably the first console FPS ever that didn't horribly suck in one way (bad port of a PC game to an underpowered console, anyone?) or another (boring gameplay, excruciating controls, the list goes on). It has single-player gameplay well beyond "shoot everything that moves and press all the door switches", and people seem to like the multiplayer, though I never tried it. |
Cloud121 | Apr 25, 2004 | |||
It's kinda fitting that this is going on. Afterall, NiGHTS was billed as the Mario 64 killer. I prefer NiGHTS over Mario 64. Although Mario 64 just plain owns. |
Sundance_2 | Apr 25, 2004 | |||
Keep in mind, this the poll is just a marketing ploy by Gamefaqs and CNet brining in site traffic, and thus any argument over who wins would be pointless. The owner(s) of the site could care less whats the 'The Best Game' or 'Best Character', but only offer it because they believe that the poll may be enough to get a user who doesn't drop by alot to start coming by daily to visit thier site. Thus to think of it as anything less than that (such as something with official capacity) would be ridiculous. Usually I follow the belief that if I even end up finding myself getting emotianally involved in ANYTHING on the 'net (whether it would be an online game, poll, message board post, etc), then it's time to do each of the following: 1. Get off the internet for some time. 2. Get a grip of myself 3. Remeber that these game/people/polls/etc have no impact on my life. 4. Do something constructive. |
Pearl Jammzz | Apr 25, 2004 | |||
Excyber, you NEVER played Goldeneye multiplayer!!?!?!!? are you MAD?! haha. Your missin out.....prob. wouldn't be as good today as it was back in 97 (think that's when it came out). Go get 4 friends and bust it out, it's great. |
CrazyGoon | Apr 26, 2004 | ||||
Goldeneye was pretty good. With what ExCyber said, it's not all about shooting everything you see (that's secondary), but it's more about completing the objectives in each level - prime example of what makes an 'Action' game. Compared to Doom (A 'Shoot-em-Up'), where you have no specified objectives and must simply find the exit, and shoot your way forward, of course Goldeneye may seem to be ''more advanced' game, but genres shouldn't be cross-compared, as results will vary. I found it pretty cool to have played this game after I saw the movie, then was able to recognise all the levels Too bad I have nothing to say for PDS, since (alas), I have yet to play the game. Next time I'm in the mood for a good RPG, I'll have to give it a go. |
it290 | Apr 26, 2004 | |||
Okay, come on people, today is Ocarina of Time vs. Fallout 2 ... OoT is a great game to be sure, but nothing can topple Fallout 2, the king of all RPGs.. a vote for Fallout is a vote for the future of the free world! |
Resident_Lurker | Apr 27, 2004 | |||
If any of you entered the contest, what game do you have set to win? I've got Mario 3 and Mario 64 up against each other at the end, with M64 coming out on top. |
1 | 2 | Next> |