Home | Forums | What's new | Resources | |
Stupidest idea ever :) |
Slurrey - Feb 23, 2005 |
mal | Feb 23, 2005 | |||
I seem to recall that someone has asked this before... [edit] Ha! It was you.... |
Slurrey | Feb 23, 2005 | ||||
I was just about to ask if it WAS me |
lordofduct | Feb 23, 2005 | |||
I like the comment about it being an economical space heater! Why bother... they should start by using the 32X to its fullest potential first. |
ExCyber | Feb 25, 2005 | |||
I doubt it would work (without severe hardware hacks to change the mapping); if I recall Charles MacDonald's descriptions right, it sounds like the 32X does its own DTACK generation and address decoding for a couple ranges not in the usual ROM address space. |
Mask of Destiny | Feb 25, 2005 | |||
Really? I assumed that the only thing it generated a DTACK signal for was access to the cartridge through the banked area. It's hard to imagine anything on the 32X that would be too slow for the 68K, though I suppose there are other possible areas of memory contention. Eh, I'll doubt I'll ever have 2 32Xs to waste my time with anyway. |
fonzievoltonov | Mar 2, 2005 | |||
"You certainly wouldn't be able to have a cart based game (becuase of the way the cart is shared between the 32X and the Genesis), but you might be able to get away with a CD game." About the segacd boot: Maybe just the lower 32x will work (cause it intercept some mapping) when the genesis will enable it... To enable the second one (the top), it will require to use the bankswitch area but... For the Dtack thing, i think too its only when the 2 cpus (68k and one of the Sh) want to acces cartridge at once. BTw: In europe, it is said (on 32x box) "a 32x upgradable can upgrade a 32x" or something strange like that.... What is this for? What does it means? |
Mask of Destiny | Mar 2, 2005 | |||
My thought was that you'd use the first 32X to initialize the second one, but this will only work if the full 16MB of address space on the 32X cartridge port is available to the SH-2s. |
Quakester2000 | Mar 5, 2005 | |||
Wasnt the sega 32x upgradable so if the 32x had been a super success sega could have released something to upgrade it again. |
SAG26 | Mar 16, 2005 | |||
Does the 32X work on the model 1 Genesis? For some reason I'm thinking it doesn't, I don't know why. Probably because everytime I see a 32X on the net its in a model 2 or model 3 Genesis. |
ExCyber | Mar 16, 2005 | |||
It does work, though its operation is reportedly unstable on some board revisions (I haven't seen this myself). |
lordofduct | Mar 16, 2005 | |||
So maybe thats the problem Snakey and I are having with our 32Xs... but wait that wouldn't explain why only 1 of my 3 do it. Grrrrrr. |