| Home | Forums | What's new | Resources | |
| Soul Calibur II |
| retroborg - Jan 10, 2004 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | Next |
| Lyzel | Jan 10, 2004 | ||
| Heh, I agree. I bought Soul Calibur 2, but took it back for something else. It didn't really do it for me. | |||
| Shitface | Jan 11, 2004 | ||
| Necrid? ha... thats cute. | |||
| it290 | Jan 11, 2004 | ||
| Hmm... I wasn't a big fan of VF3TB. I'd rather play VF2 or even good 'ol VF. | |||
| axelblazeadam | Jan 11, 2004 | |||
VF3 didn't suck but it was the least accessible game of the series. VF4 fixed that problem making it more fun for beginners as well as the experts. VF3 on the DC also wasn't helped by being a rushed conversion in order to make the launch. | ||||
| retroborg | Jan 11, 2004 | ||
| When I say VF3 sucked, I don't mean the arcade version of course! That game looked gorgious back in 1996! Awesome game. Nothing like the sucky rushed DC conversion! Are the cool jumps present in VF4:Evolution? | |||
| Cloud121 | Jan 11, 2004 | ||
| Still.. you do not insult the greatest game series by saying things like that... | |||
| Ammut | Jan 12, 2004 | ||
| Soul Calibur 2 was a huge dissapointment to me. I'm glad I rented it first because there is no way I'd buy this game. I really didn't feel like it improved much over the original, especially looking at how much later SCII came out. As for VF3...that was also a huge dissapointment in my books. It got its ass handed to it due to Soul Calibur being released at the same time. It definitely is the worst in the series to date. ---Ammut | |||
| Pearl Jammzz | Jan 12, 2004 | ||
| I agree, VF3 sucked a fatty. I much rather play 2 or 4 | |||
| Tagrineth | Jan 12, 2004 | ||
| To be fair, SoulCalibur II is a good game in its own right... but it really NEEDS something to differentiate itself from the first. >_> Now, Guilty Gear X2 on the other hand... | |||
| Cloud121 | Jan 12, 2004 | ||
| Suzuki even said it himself that VF3 was mainly designed for the hardcore VF player. The funny thing is... before I got it on DC, I only played VF3 TWICE in the arcade! You know what? I'll think I'll go play some VF3 now! :cheers :thumbs-up: | |||
| Pyrite | Jan 12, 2004 | |||
VF3 did NOT suck! No VF game sucks! And Virtua Fighter Evolution is just the greatest game period. Only one game can beat it, Virtua Fighter 5![/b][/quote] They all suck! Virtua Fighter is lame ass yuck! Specially compared with games like Tekken or DOA. | ||||
| Tagrineth | Jan 13, 2004 | |||
Even Toshinden is better than Tekken. <_< >_> | ||||
| muffinman943 | Jan 13, 2004 | ||
| vf 3 was stupid crap, i was excited finding it, but geez, what crap. tekken sux, every1 who likes it should go to hell. vf evo wuz gr8 alan doree sux | |||
| Cloud121 | Jan 13, 2004 | ||
| I guess the only people who like/liked VF3 are the ones that it was designed for: The Hardcore Fans (such as myself | |||
| Des-ROW | Jan 13, 2004 | ||
| Only one development team has managed to make a GOOD 3D fighting game, and that is Team Ninja. Dead or Alive 3 is the best 3D fighting game. All other developers still have much to learn. All 3D fighters lack of dynamism and good hit distances, while Dead or Alive is dynamic as hell. Oh, and, I agree, any Toshinden is better than any Tekken, gameplay-wise. | |||
| it290 | Jan 13, 2004 | ||
| Toshinden _was_ good. Des-ROW, I thought you were a Virtua Fighter fan? I don't know what you mean by dynamism, but I have to disagree with you that DoA 3 is the best 3d fighting game. IMHO, the DoA series on the whole lacks depth and relies too much on counters. The combo system is also weak. My favorite (I won't go so far as to say it's the best) 3d fighter is Project Justice, but that game plays much more like a traditional 2d game. | |||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | Next |