Home | Forums | What's new | Resources | |
Old Pentium machine gets jitters playing MP3s |
racketboy - Jul 18, 2003 |
1 | 2 | Next> |
Scared0o0Rabbit | Jul 19, 2003 | |||
I recall that my pentium 90 couldn't handle mp3's... dunno if that offers any insight lol. |
Jurai | Jul 20, 2003 | |||
Sounds like a slow hdd problem personally Also, try decreasing the output buffer |
racketboy | Jul 20, 2003 | ||||
I don't think a new 120GB 7200RPM Seagate Barracuda is slow |
racketboy | Jul 20, 2003 | |||
I can't seem to get the HD to use DMA in Win2K Here's a screenshot of Device Manager... What do I need to do to fix this? |
Curtis | Jul 20, 2003 | |||
You haven't done something silly like put a CD-Rom on the same IDE channel have you? |
Curtis | Jul 20, 2003 | |||
Three possibilities occur to me: You have a dodgy IDE cable that does not support DMA speeds (is there such a thing?) Compaq in their infinte wisdom, decided that DMA was useless and picked a motherboard that did not support this. AKA, you're stuffed. Windows 2K does not know how to use the IDE interface properly. You might be able to find an updated driver set for your motherboard on the Compaq website, or through some other third party driver sites. You could also buy a PCI HD controller - that should fix the problems with DMA. |
racketboy | Jul 20, 2003 | |||
Well just to let you know, I'm using the cable that came with the new Segate Drive. Would a new controller be worth the investment, even if it isn't the root of my MP3 problems? |
Curtis | Jul 20, 2003 | |||
Probably. If you are using it for a fileserver, you should notice some fairly major speed improvements with DMA enabled. Additionally, you'd be able to use the full ATA100 speed of your new drive with a PCI card, although the performance of PCI HD controllers isn't as good as onboard devices. |
racketboy | Jul 20, 2003 | |||
Well I fixed the jitters problem I found AWEAmp -- a plugin for Winamp that does some low-level work with the AWE64 cards. I boosted up the buffer on its settings and now my music is as smooth as butter. BTW, the buffer on Winamp's basic controls didn't make a difference. On the note of the IDE controller, would it really make that much of a difference considering the speed might be limited by the speed of the network. I could be terribly wrong though since I can't remember basic transfer speeds of different stuff |
HimuraD | Jul 21, 2003 | |||
jesus, are me and rabbit the only ones with decent comps? EDIT: ok, rabbit explained this was a dumpster pc. it makes a lil more sense, but shiz, you coulda taken an 80 and at least got a low end xp and and low end amd board for it. |
Scared0o0Rabbit | Jul 21, 2003 | ||||
OUCH edit: besides, I'm sure Jesus has a better computer than me ^_~ |
racketboy | Jul 21, 2003 | ||||
|