| Home | Forums | What's new | Resources | |
| Google trials 1 GB e-mail archive |
| MasterAkumaMatata - Apr 5, 2004 |
| MasterAkumaMatata | Apr 5, 2004 | |||
<!--QuoteBegin-h ttp://gmail.google.c om/gmail/help/about. html [color=00ff00]1. What makes Gmail different?[/color] Gmail uses Google search technology to automatically organize and find messages. And because Gmail includes 1,000 megabytes of storage, a typical user won't ever have to worry about deleting mail. Everything just gets archived so it can be found again if needed. There are other differences in the way Gmail provides access to your email. For example, Gmail automatically groups an email and the replies to it as a conversation. That means you always see a message in its proper context. And there are no pop-ups or banner ads in Gmail, just relevant text ads and links to related pages. Gmail's other distinctive features include a labeling system, a spam reporter and a system for filtering your mail as it comes into your inbox. [color=00ff00]2. How much does Gmail cost?[/color] Gmail is a free service and includes 1,000 megabytes of storage with each account. However, Gmail is still in preview mode as we test it to work out the kinks. So for now, it's not generally available. [color=00ff00]3. How do I sign up? When can I get a Gmail account?[/color] We're currently only offering Gmail as part of a preview release and limited test. We don't have details on when Gmail will be made more widely available, as that depends in part on the results of the test. If you're interested in receiving updates on Gmail, submit your email address using the form at the bottom of this page. [color=00ff00]4. Is Gmail available in other languages?[/color] During this testing period, the Gmail interface is only available in English. However, we're committed to making Gmail available to as many people in as many languages as possible. And Gmail accounts can already be used to read and send email in most languages (even Klingon).[/quote] Sounds like an April Fools prank to me, but wouldn't it be cool if it was real? :lol: | ||||
| mal | Apr 5, 2004 | ||||||
That's just too scary. That doesn't surprise me one bit. | |||||||
| racketboy | Apr 5, 2004 | ||
| I don't think I'd sign up for it. I don't even use more than a few megs. If I accumulated too much more, I'd never find anything -- even with search. But I think it might be fun to search other people's email | |||
| ExCyber | Apr 6, 2004 | |||
It's not an official standard; Klingon was apparently proposed and rejected for Unicode as "unsuitable for encoding" (though I couldn't find the reason). However, there is a subset of the Unicode tables reserved for "private use", and there is a convention for encoding Klingon within that area. edit: got curious; couldn't find an official source but apparently the major reason for rejecting Klingon is that virtually everyone who writes Klingon text (online or otherwise) uses the Latin transcription anyway. The residual copies thing makes perfect sense when you consider how much work it would be for any large-scale distributed storage system to seek out every backup copy of a file and annihilate it (especially if some of it is read-only). Hell, most consumer systems can't do that either. Most likely the same thing is true of Hotmail, Yahoo, etc. | ||||
| MasterAkumaMatata | Jun 15, 2004 | |||
Just logged in to my free Yahoo email account and noticed some changes. First is the cosmetic change. Second and more important is the 100 MB quota. | ||||
| racketboy | Jun 15, 2004 | ||
| yup -- they've been rumoring it. I just signed up for a new Yahoo account (my old one was too spammed). Also nice that My Yahoo is beta testing RSS support for us blog fans! | |||