Home | Forums | What's new | Resources | |
BIN+CUE versus ISO+MP3 |
dhau - Nov 25, 2003 |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next> |
Jurai | Nov 25, 2003 | |||
bin/cue rocks, iso/mp3 sucks, end of story, don't forget to mention the nice gapping that occurs when you burn from mp3's (saturns handle it better than scd's tend to) |
dhau | Nov 25, 2003 | |||
Haha, someone actually voted for ISO/MP3 |
racketboy | Nov 25, 2003 | |||
for me it depends on the game. if it's one that isn't that important to me and I plan on storing it on the HD for a while, I'll rip to ISO/MP3 |
Scared0o0Rabbit | Nov 25, 2003 | |||
I've got all my games on my hard drive, most of which are in bin/cue except for a couple that are in iso/mp3. |
slacker52 | Nov 25, 2003 | ||||
same here on the the first line, but think of the games with 1 audio track, like "this is a game disk, it will |= |_| C |< up your standard stereo" like sakura taisen *wars, whatever* or lunar silver star, umong othhers. in which case it doesnt realy matter what format its in, because that one track is usless anyways :blah |
mal | Nov 26, 2003 | ||||
Sure there isn't any... |
IBarracudaI | Nov 26, 2003 | |||
I also have my doubts about that.. but lets believe him. |
racketboy | Nov 26, 2003 | |||
[sarcastic tone ] haha |
Tagrineth | Nov 26, 2003 | |||
Down with cue-sheets altogether. I'd rather a more all-encompassing format like CDI or NRG became standard, so that the entire structure of the CD could be maintained to the exact frame (something bin/cue doesn't do), keep multisession data (something bin/cue CAN'T do), and keep exact track info (bin/cue can't have 'negative time' in tracks - cdi/nrg can). |
mal | Nov 26, 2003 | |||
Maybe NRG, but not CDI. IMHO DiscJuggler sucks. |
CrazyGoon | Nov 26, 2003 | |||
Bin+Cue = best NRG or Clone CD = second best CDI = third best Iso+mp3 = fourth best Bin+Cue is best suited for saturn rips as they are perfect rips from the games (no loss of quality anywhere) plus it is nice and easy to patch to a different region if you have to. CDI and NRG are a pain to change the region. Final note - If you want the best format to preserve games and make them available to others, Bin+Cue is the best, as CDRWIN kicks Nero and Diskjuggler's arse. Clone CD is alright. If you aren't planning on spreading the images around, then by all means, pick the iso+mp3 alternative to save space. |
gameboy900 | Nov 27, 2003 | |||
FYI CloneCD = BIN + CUE The only thing clone cd adds is the subchannel data. Which I doubt you really need anyway. |
ExCyber | Nov 27, 2003 | |||
It would be really nice if someone could come up with an open "universal" format. I do sort of like the advantage of being able to manually edit a .cue or .ccd to look at disc info or experiment, but realistically I think the drawbacks of keeping the metadata separate outweigh the benefits. |
CrazyGoon | Nov 27, 2003 | |||
Nearly. Clone CD = raw Iso and cue. Not bin. |
HunterX | Nov 27, 2003 | |||
I prefer MDF/MDS alcohol |
gameboy900 | Nov 27, 2003 | ||||
Umm...bin is RAW (ie. 2352). ISO is cooked (ie 2048). |
IBarracudaI | Nov 27, 2003 | |||
? ISO's can be both modes.. cooked or raw... the same with BIN's... The diference is that ISO's are images of a single track. BIN's can have multiple tracks on it.. a BIN for a cd with only one track is exactly the same as an ISO for that track, given that both are in same mode (cooked or raw). Clone CD .img files is the same as a CDRWIN's BIN file in RAW mode. |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next> |