| |
Originally posted by SkankinMonkey+Mar 18, 2003 @ 04:38 AM-->QUOTE(SkankinMonkey @ Mar 18, 2003 @ 04:38 AM)
| |
Originally posted by Lyzel@Mar 18, 2003 @ 07:11 AM
QUOTE(Curtis @ Mar 18, 2003 @ 10:22 AM) Even your Government's own intelligence agencies predict that attacking Iraq will increase the terrorist threat because by a great many people, the war perceived as unjustified. As soon as the war was officially announced the alert status in your country was raised to its second highest level. Why do you think that is?[/b]
|
This happens anytime there is war on any country. Just like France, Russia, Germany, etc alerted it's citizens to leave the country or be vigilant in your surrounding. What's the big deal?
| |
Originally posted by Curtis@ Mar 18, 2003 @ 10:22 AM
US does not have UN backing - the reverse of the situation with the Afganistan war because the US has convinced no one that there is a real reason to attack now. The legality of this conflict is questionable. Bush's motives and eventual goal(s) remain unclear. Why not withdraw troops, wait for the inspectors to be booted from the country again and then attack?
|
Iraq has had 12 years to disarm. Enough is enough. Diplomacy has been exhausted. The United States does not need the backing of the UN Security Council when it's security is at stake. If the Security Council does not want to enforce Resolution 1441, then they should be irrelevant. Oh, do you know why France threatens to veto any resolution on Iraq?? Because they, just like Russia have interest/special relations with Iraq.
|