| Home | Forums | What's new | Resources | |
| Saddam Caught! |
| IceDigger - Dec 14, 2003 |
| < Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
 |
ExCyber | Dec 14, 2003 | ||
| If that's all you can see, you're not even paying attention to the thread. Not everything is about Bush. | ||||
 |
Jeffrey | Dec 14, 2003 | ||
|
blind... zombie... follower... must... obey... leader... Bush... good... vote again...  | ||||
|
Jeffrey | Dec 14, 2003 | ||
|
Woah, I am not behind him. I am trying to be objective. And I don't think it is fair to claim authority without appointment or permission -- as this year's Noble peace Prize winner said. Why did we even ask other countries for permission if we were going to just do it anyway? Also, it is not fair to be selective. Stop some crimes, and watch others without interfereing. Especially if the cops only serve people with money! | ||||
|
Jurai | Dec 14, 2003 | |||
nm i misread his 3rd line, and i dont feel like bashing him more | |||||
|
Jeffrey | Dec 15, 2003 | |||
Ah-ha! I knew it! IRAQI SYMPATHIZER! It will be my duty to report you to the CIA. You are now officially on an FBI watch-list. | |||||
|
Jurai | Dec 15, 2003 | ||
| jeff stop acting like a fucking shit tard who just finished guzzling donkey cum | ||||
 |
it290 | Dec 15, 2003 | ||
| I don't know Jurai, I really think there are a fair number of Americans, myself included, and people of pretty much every other nationality who think Bush is somewhat 'evil' (whatever that term may mean). It's certainly not that hard to draw that conclusion given his actions, whether it be being partially responsible for the deaths of innocent Iraqis, Afghanis, and American soldiers, pushing legislation that has harmful effects upon the environment, supporting the limitation of the freedoms of American citizens, lying to the public (in several cases), or just good 'ol complicity in making his corporate buddies some cash. | ||||
|
Jurai | Dec 15, 2003 | ||
| bush didnt order troops to go shoot civilians, saddam did, so stfu stupid ######, k fucking thnx | ||||
 |
Scared0o0Rabbit | Dec 15, 2003 | ||
| it's good that saddam is gone, in some ways he was the hitler of iraq. with that said, I just hope bush doesn't get re-elected. If so it's going to be coin toss time: heads to invade mexico, tails to invade canada. | ||||
|
Jeffrey | Dec 15, 2003 | ||
| oh... now I see why he got banned. | ||||
 |
Ammut | Dec 15, 2003 | ||
Aww, I was going to come back to Jurai's pathetically immature comments... but now hes gone... arty First Saddam, now this? Today is indeed a good day  I'm glad Saddam is gone, I'm sure the question of what to do with him will be discussed and announced through the media soon enough. Did anyone else see Bush and Blair's Speeches though? :blah :wanker ---Ammut | ||||
|
Jeffrey | Dec 15, 2003 | ||
| I think the admins are taking inspiration from the capture... they've banned two people today. Both who seemed to have it coming for a while. | ||||
|
axelblazeadam | Dec 15, 2003 | ||
|
Man this topic has grown since I last posted. Just thought I'd say that being Anti Saddam and Anti Bush are not mutually exclusive. I think Saddam had to be removed but I'm no Bush supporter. I've hated him since I heard of his policy on the environment(or lack of one) and I hope he loses the next election. | ||||
|
Jeffrey | Dec 15, 2003 | ||
|
Oh boy is Bush going to spin this capture during the next election! But history shows that we tend to elect a more passive president after any major war. If Hillary EVER had a chance, I guess it would be now. Can you imagine an election between Hillary and Colin Powell??? I don't know who I'd vote for... | ||||
|
Ammut | Dec 15, 2003 | ||||||
Thats another great reason behind attacking Iraq... "If we can't get the bad guy we're after, perhaps we can make one look just as bad, then catch him.Yea!"
I'll email all the Iraqis newsgroups | ||||||||