Home | Forums | What's new | Resources | |
Building t3h c0mp |
Gallstaff - Jul 5, 2003 |
< Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next> |
Alexvrb | Jul 29, 2003 | |||
7200RPM (or slower) HDDs cant even reach sustained speeds of 100 MB/sec yet. The rotational speed and density of the drive are more important. If its a small, outdated 5400 RPM drive, I'd say screw it. But if its of any decent size, it'd at least make good storage. But yeah, doesn't really matter if you dont need it. As far as the "9500 to 9700" trick goes, I thought that was for the 9500 regular. See http://www.tomshardware.com/graphic/200304...on_96... for details. The modified drivers reactivate the 4 disabled pipelines in the 9500 - the 9500 is an artificially gimped chip. 9600 is actually a true cut-down chip, so there is no similar trick. Check out http://www.omegacorner.com/... for more info. You could always OC in addition to using the Omega drivers, of course, but how far you can go all depends on the card and the cooling. Anyway, for prices you're not going to get a lot cheaper than that for a Pro model. Regular 9500s clock in at around 135-140, but the Pro models are getting pricey. |
Curtis | Jul 31, 2003 | |||
That sounds sweet! What G/C are you using to get those scores? I'd guess it would have to be a 9700Pro, or FX5800 at least... |
gameboy900 | Jul 31, 2003 | |||
I'm using the Radeon 9800 Pro and the ram is this... stuff. Oh and the CPU is overclocked running with a regular Thermaltake Volcano 9 heatsink at about 4000RPM. |
Gallstaff | Aug 1, 2003 | |||
HOw much was the ram and how the hell did you afford a 98 pro? |
gameboy900 | Aug 1, 2003 | |||
The ram cost me $260 CAD (or about $185 USD). And I was able to afford all this because I: a. finished school and have no debt to pay for loans (since I never took any) b. I (sadly) live with my parents so I have no rent or food costs c. I have a job d. my only expenses are the $25 a month for my cell phone and whatever I spend on gas for my car Oh and just for good measure here are my full pc specs. - Athlon XP 2500+ 1.8Ghz (OC'd to 2.15 Ghz) - Thermaltake Volcano 9 fan/heatsink - OCZ Dual EL 3500 2x 256MB Ram (two specially selected sticks to provide better performance in dual channel mode) - Asus A7N8X Deluxe Rev. 1.04 (stock heatsink on northbridge replaced by Thermaltake Crystal Orb fan/heatsink) - Ati Radeon 9800 Pro 128MB - Maxtor 120GB 7200RPM ATA133 - LG 16x10x40x CDRW - Panasonic 8x DVD - Aver TV/FM 98 Stereo (tv tunner card) - Generic 3.5" floppy - Arctic Silver 3 on all heatsinks Externally I have: - Sony Trinitron 17" 200ES monitor - Logitech 640 5.1 speakers - Generic keyboard - Microsoft optical mouse (in classic design) |
Gallstaff | Aug 1, 2003 | |||
Nice |
Gallstaff | Aug 2, 2003 | |||
Oh also will any two sticks of the same ram work for duel channel if i get a board which supports it or do they have to be special? |
fivefeet8 | Aug 2, 2003 | ||||
Any 2 sticks of ram that have the same capacity will work in dual channel. Be sure to check your mobo's manual to find out which 2 dimm slots to use for dual channel. Nice specs gameboy. *looks at my sig*. I'm happy with what I got too. :lol: |
MasterAkumaMatata | Aug 2, 2003 | ||||
Here is my feeble computer:
|
Gallstaff | Aug 2, 2003 | |||
Ah akuma you have a dvd writer maybe you can help me. What are the different formats because i'm thinking of getting one but dont know where to start with the slashes and the + and the - it hurts to think. So do you know what the diff formats are and what the best dvd records are? |
gameboy900 | Aug 3, 2003 | |||
There are drives out now from Pioneer and Sony (probably others too) that do both DVD dash (DVD-R/RW) and DVD plus (DVD+R/RW). One of those two formats will eventually become standard so getting a combo drive will eliminate any problems for you. As for which one is the best....theres still a debate going on about that. |
Pearl Jammzz | Aug 3, 2003 | |||
what's the dif strenghts and weaknesses of the 2? |
ExCyber | Aug 3, 2003 | |||
Basically, -R/RW (read "dash", not "minus"; I feel like the +RW Alliance is insulting my intelligence or something) has a longer history, is officially recognized/supported by the DVD Forum, is designed for single-session writing, and seems to be more tightly controlled by its patent owners (I think Pioneer is the main one). +R/RW is supported by a motley crew of computer companies, is optimized a bit for consumer video applications, and the DVD Forum doesn't recognize it (and in fact actively disavows any association with it). The differences between the formats are smaller than most +R/RW promoters (there aren't really -R/RW promoters so much as there are users, because it's the incumbent) would have you believe, but it might be enough that +R/RW is noticeably better for VCR replacements. |
Pearl Jammzz | Aug 4, 2003 | |||
so the only dif in the 2 is that +r/rw is better for putting your old vcr tapes onto dvds? One can't store more than the other? Can't burn/read at faster speeds? one more reliable? one can do sumthin the other can't? |
< Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next> |