| Home | Forums | What's new | Resources | |
| Wal Mart.. Good or Evil |
| RitualOfTheTrout - Jan 21, 2004 |
| Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| racketboy | Jan 23, 2004 | |||
West Michigan? [/b][/quote] Lansing area | ||||
| racketboy | Jan 23, 2004 | ||||||
you could always start a business that supplies to or works with WalMart I read in Money magazine that the companies that make Walmart's "store brand" stuff are making good money. In addition, when you start your own business, you need to realize that it's a risk no matter what your business is. You can make money and you can lose money. If you don't want to take that risk, get a normal job working for someone else that will take that risk. | |||||||
| RitualOfTheTrout | Jan 23, 2004 | ||
| I just think its a shame that a company that makes billion upon billions of dollars cant pay its employees a little bit better.. If you have little choice but to work at a place and you dont have benefits times can be tough.. I know its not wal marts problem.. but they act like the friendly nieghbor that is here to help.. and that just isnt the case.. Capatalism can be good to a point.. But i feel if any one company in any business becomes to big it can only mean trouble for everyone else.. | |||
| racketboy | Jan 23, 2004 | ||
| A Walmart job is better than no job. There's always McDonalds too Anyway, nobody forces people to work there. There's plenty of other opportunities. | |||
| ExCyber | Jan 24, 2004 | |||
Well no, there are not plenty of opportunites. If there were, people wouldn't be working for minimum wage. | ||||
| racketboy | Jan 24, 2004 | ||
| but there are also plenty of people who get paid more | |||
| ExCyber | Jan 24, 2004 | ||
| "Plenty", even by the most conservative defintion, means at least enough. How is it that "plenty" of people are being paid substantially more than minimum wage and yet there are calls by labor organizations to increase the minimum wage? Why would anyone care about this if "plenty" of people are already making more? | |||
| racketboy | Jan 24, 2004 | ||
| raising minimum wage would just increase inflation. if minimum wage goes up, everyone else will want a raise and then your dollar will be worth less | |||
| MasterAkumaMatata | Jan 24, 2004 | ||
| :huh So to combat inflation, one solution is to lower minimum wage? :lol: | |||
| ExCyber | Jan 24, 2004 | ||
| You're all but arguing my point for me - if raising the minimum wage causes so many problems, and hardly anyone depends on it anyway, why are large labor organizations pushing for it? Surely their memberships have bigger fish to fry if things are as you say. | |||
| racketboy | Jan 24, 2004 | ||
| I'm just saying raising minimum wage isn't an easy solution | |||
| ExCyber | Jan 24, 2004 | |||
| And I'm not saying it's a solution, I'm just saying that the problem of a job shortage is there in the first place, something that your previous posts seem to deny. Perhaps. The economy is sort of like the "five blind men and an elephant" idiom, and the field of economics is based more strongly on ideology than on any kind of clear empirical basis, so it's hard to say for sure what would help and what wouldn't. Still, I'm inclined to think that Treasury, Federal Reserve, and import/export policies probably affect inflation quite a bit more heavily than the minimum wage. | ||||
| it290 | Jan 24, 2004 | ||
| Too true. I think part of the problem is that when politicians deal with economic issues, they tend to speak of them as if they were cut-and-dry, when in fact the global enonomy is a system whose complexity and chaotic nature rivals that of the weather, or seismic movements. | |||
| Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 |