HomeForumsWhat's newResources 
 
 
US run by psychopaths
mal - Mar 7, 2003

 < Prev  1  2  3  4  Next> 

  FAKK2 Mar 10, 2003
Yeah, well Im from the usa, and I say we kill them all!

Until then.... Here's to another beautiful war. Cheers! :cheers

 IceDigger Mar 10, 2003


Which presents more of a danger to you, a policeman with a gun or a murderer with a gun? Missles in the hands of a dictator which can be fired at anybody on any whim are much different than missles in the hands of an elected official needing the approval of others to do anything.

 racketboy Mar 10, 2003
nice point


  ExCyber Mar 10, 2003

  
	
	

		
		

			Which presents more of a danger to you, a policeman with a gun or a murderer with a gun?


I'd liken it to a policeman with a bazooka and a murderer with a knife collection. I don't want the murderer to be free to swing his knives around, but I'm about 100 feet away from the showdown, and I'm a little worried about the shrapnel from a bazooka shot. No matter how many times the policeman tells me that he's doing this to keep everybody safe, or mentions how evil the murderer is, it's not going to make the shrapnel disappear.


  
	
	

		
		

			Missles in the hands of a dictator which can be fired at anybody on any whim are much different than missles in the hands of an elected official needing the approval of others to do anything.


Lack of authorization doesn't magically stop a finger from flipping a switch or pushing a button. Once an arsenal is deployed, nobody sitting in an office in The Homeland is going to be able to stop it unless the man at the controls is in agreement. Abuse of trust is a bitch, just look at the history of this site...

 Zero 9 Mar 10, 2003

  
	
	

		
		

			Originally posted by Daniel Eriksson@Mar 8, 2003 @ 12:18 AM



 So true, so true. And guess what, US is the only country that have ever used weapons of mass destruction.


Where do you get this idea from? Most nuclear powers have tested these devices, but yes the United States is the only country to use an atomic weapon for an attack, which is the main reason why there is such fear of them today. Nuclear weapons, however, are not the only ones that cause mass destruction.

 racketboy Mar 10, 2003
hey wasn't it a democrat who used the nuke? (Truman)

hehe -- just has to throw that in there

 mal Mar 10, 2003

  
	
	

		
		

			Originally posted by IceMan2k@Mar 11, 2003 @ 04:07 AM



 Missles in the hands of a dictator which can be fired at anybody on any whim are much different than missles in the hands of an elected official needing the approval of others to do anything.


If that's the case, why is the Bush administration saying it will go ahead with an attack on Iraq whether it has the UN Security Council's approval or not?

 thx12 Mar 10, 2003
http://www.americanfreepress.net/...

 Curtis Mar 10, 2003
Yes...and?

 Alexvrb Mar 11, 2003

  
	
	

		
		

			Originally posted by Zero 9+Mar 10, 2003 @ 10:41 PM-->
QUOTE(Zero 9 @ Mar 10, 2003 @ 10:41 PM)