Home | Forums | What's new | Resources | |
Matrix Revolutions |
mal - Nov 7, 2003 |
< Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next> |
mtxblau | Nov 10, 2003 | |||
By the Corporate Mofo... After reading the last few analyses on the trilogy, makes the philosophy and the movie arc itself seem ridiculously brilliant. But that I'll leave to your interpretation. |
Tagrineth | Nov 11, 2003 | ||||||||||||||||
Easy - how else are the machines going to get the power they need to survive? And remember, the Architect said at the end of Revolutions that any humans that wished to leave, were free to go, they wouldn't try to stop it anymore.
Ah, I dunno. The opponents in The Matrix's lobby shootout acted human, they didn't pull any odd stunts. We're both splitting hairs, really.
Precisely. There was a decent amount in Reloaded that, if you didn't pay attention, could trip you up watching Revolutions.
Heavier mass = more inertia, thus the equation balances out if the ship can accelerate to a high enough velocity. The thing was moving damned fast, remember?
True about the real world fight, but the final battle used few to no strobes. It was in the rain, though - there were a few flashes of lightning but nothing remotely regular. |
jolly rogers | Nov 11, 2003 | |||
Seems to me that this whole Matrix series(which I absolutely loved) is based on gnostic Christianity, obviousy there are other elements but gnosticism seems to be the main thing it draws from, any you guys know anything about gnosticism? |
Tagrineth | Nov 12, 2003 | ||||
By the way, THEY SAID IT WOULD BE TBC WHEN THEY ANNOUNCED THEY'D CONTINUE THE SERIES. ohhhh dear how awful |
thailees | Nov 20, 2003 | |||
i like the first movie best than rest of them...its always a theroy like the first is the original best.. |
Gallstaff | Nov 21, 2003 | |||
Same. This one blew ass. Not because of the plot or whatever, but it was just generally a shitty movie. |
Scared0o0Rabbit | Nov 21, 2003 | |||
You tell us to pay attention to the movie. Like we didn't actually watch it or something. I did pay attention, doesn't change the fact that I think the second movie sucked the fattest horse cock in the entire world. I do wish I had my time and money back, and I'm glad I wasn't duped into seeing the third one too. If I want to listen to a bunch of philosphy or something I'll take a class on it. |
gameboy900 | Nov 21, 2003 | |||
The ship ISN'T really a true hovercraft. They just call it that because that's all it can do in the tunnels. Think of it more like a chopper on roids. It can basically do impressive manouvers close to the ground (like a chopper) but can also use bursts of speed to exceed it's normal operation ranges (again like choppers). Remeber the technology that the ships use to fly is the same one that all the sentinels and other machines use to fly. The whole electricity arching thing is either because they generate some sort of magnetic field using electric gyros or simply because it looks cool. Also from the looks of things the dark clouds looked like they were only 1 or 2 km from groundlevel. So getting above them wouldn't be that hard. As for why all the clone smiths just stand around at the end. It could be possible that they were simply not capable of putting up a fight. Remember in the reloaded how easily neo kicked all of their asses? Well in revolutions what I think happened was that the standing ones "sent" their power to that one smith copy (original?) to use in the fight. Hence why he was so much more powerful and harder for neo to fight. At the end the matrix didn't reload (that would have cause all the humans hooked up to it to die). It simply got uncorrupted. Kinda like how a virus scanner removes the bad bits to restore a file. Also remember that the machines think of themselves as better than humans (the architects last line is a perfect example). So the idea of going back on their word would seem too dirty and human like. And they're not gonna just unplug all the humans at once, there would be no way to feed and shelter that many people. Not to mention the shock it would cause to them all (remember neos reaction in the first movie?). And am I the only one who felt the ending was really depressing? |
Tagrineth | Nov 21, 2003 | |||||||
Agreed on all points, EXCEPT:
No, all the humans would NOT die. the Architect said nothing of the sort in his speech in Reloaded. The only humans that would be killed off would be the previous inhabitants of Zion.
Reloaded would have def been worse with no plot, just action. |
slacker52 | Nov 21, 2003 | |||
tho ive not seen revolutions, id say all these nay sayers actually expected the movie to kick @$$. if you go into a movie with expectations your gonna be disappointed, end of story. |
Scared0o0Rabbit | Nov 22, 2003 | |||
I went into reloaded expecting it would be arlight, but not wonderful, I agree that reloaded would have been bad with no story just action, cause even the action in that movie was bad lol. In any case, the movie wasn't good even with the story so I think that says something. |
Jurai | Nov 22, 2003 | |||
reloaded had a story? |
Gallstaff | Nov 22, 2003 | |||
You know what else I just noticed? There wasn't really any attractive female lead in any of the movies IMO. I mean... dont you think if they're gonna make a shitty movie they should give us a pair of titties to look at for two hours? |
Tagrineth | Nov 22, 2003 | ||||
A heavily-Xiaoxiao influenced battle didn't faze you? Wow. And next time you think about that highway chase, I'd like you to think about how hard it would be to choreograph that. |
Gallstaff | Nov 22, 2003 | |||
Fuckin who cares how well it's choreographed? I'd take bill and ted and it's budget of a few thousand dollars over the matrix any day of the week. Did you see any fancy coreophrahing in that? Well... other than the bar fight. But still, putting work into something doesnt mean shit if the product isn't entertaining. |
gameboy900 | Nov 22, 2003 | |||
Gotta say one thing. Watching this movie on an iMax screen is something else. It's SOO much better than a regular movie screen. Where I sat the whole image filled my field of vision without making my neck hurt or having to squint to focus on it. Really immersive that way. |
slacker52 | Nov 22, 2003 | ||||
im strangely reminded of clerks, with looked like about 1 grand |
< Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next> |